Let's play word association, shall we? I say "Kaboom," and you say the first thing that pops into your head. What are some contenders? Violence? Anger? Explosions? Action? How about "planting trees?" Okay, you got me, that's 2 words, but that doesn't make the Title of this game any less silly....oh, wait. Ka-"bloom." I see what they did there....ugh...it's gonna be a long day.
In a nutshell, here's what you need to know about "Kabloom." It's not fun, it's not terribly interesting, but hot damn is it pretty. The cell-shaded look does wonders for my inner child, and wow does this game pull it off. Add to that the fact that you control the environment and you got yourself one good looking piece of software.
Of course, this is a "game," so let's analyze the gameplay. This is the kind of gameplay I'd expect from a "poetic experience" like Dreamside Maroon or, to a much lesser extent, Douse. The calming music, the lack of consequences and the pretty scenery set this game up for a perfect session of story time. So, how's the narrative?
It's unimaginative, dull and unoriginal. Maybe you think it's strange that the thing I critique most harshly in this game is its story, but come on! All the mechanics are centered around the narrative. The game even starts with a cute little nursery rhyme about the protagonist. This game is the equivalent of dog turds on a pedestal. You can extol the excrement as much as you'd like, but at the end of the day, it's still crap.
Still though, I'd say it's worth a playthrough just to experience the visual style. Once again...hot damn, this game is pretty
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay germinated
Links
Rosie the Environmentally Friendly Elephant (no, I'm not kidding): https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=8718
Monday, May 20, 2013
Sunday, May 19, 2013
the ones that start with "J"
ooh, isn't this out of the ordinary? Well, don't get too excited. There are only 3 games on the list that start with "J" and one of them doesn't work. So yeah, this will be my first double-header review. Maybe I'll group these things together more in the future...maybe I won't. who knows.
Jet Packers is a fun, simple arcade game based on how high you can ascend. You need to collect fuel tanks in order to keep going, but watch out for those asteroids! Singleplayer mode is fun if insubstantial. Where I think this game really shines is the multiplayer. As usual, I didn't have anyone to play with, so I had to try and control both guys at once, but what I saw was potential for a heated competition. The bumping mechanics, the boosting that uses up some fuel...the game is filled with things to keep the experience engaging. Of course, since I didn't actually play multiplayer, this is all just assumption. The Singleplayer mode, the only thing I can really judge, was fun in a kind of Doodle Jump sort of way, but just didn't offer enough to keep me engaged for more than a few minutes.
Johnny Origin is a weird kind of broken. clicking on its icon just makes my cursor disappear until I alt+tab to a different screen...huh.
Junk Fighter is definitely the most intricate of the "J" games. First, let me address the title. I thought this was going to be a fighting game, but it's a space shooter. That would be the logical equivalent of me naming a boxing simulator "alien blaster 9000." But I digress.
This game has 2 different phases: the top-down space shooter and the ship builder. The former is a relatively fun challenge with a few minor design flaws and the latter is competently designed but not very rewarding.
First, the game part. The tutorial levels are way too long-winded and very clumsy at describing anything more complicated than "shoot the boss to kill it." After the almost insultingly easy tutorial levels, you will lose and lose a lot. The actual levels but the "hell" in "bullet hell." I think the main thing they were trying to accomplish with the design was making the player really feel challenged in customizing his ship. After all, a bigger ship with more guns can take down more enemies and reduce the amount of fire on the screen, but it will also be a bigger target.
And that brings us to the ship customization. The aforementioned quandry would make the customization screen fun and engaging if it weren't for one thing: the game already provides you with a multitude of ships far better than anything you and your puny brain can come up with. This completely defeats the purpose of the customization screen. The levels are way too brutal to allow you to screw around, so why would you not go with the professionally designed options? Even past that, the customization is far from balanced. The spread gun, as spread guns tend to be, is drastically overpowered, although with levels this brutal, it seems like the only way to win. It's not a bad game, but it can surely get frustrating.
Well, that's all I got for now. Until next time, stay diverse
Links
Jet Packers: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=24359
Johnny Origin: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=1407
Junk Fighter: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=8717
Jet Packers is a fun, simple arcade game based on how high you can ascend. You need to collect fuel tanks in order to keep going, but watch out for those asteroids! Singleplayer mode is fun if insubstantial. Where I think this game really shines is the multiplayer. As usual, I didn't have anyone to play with, so I had to try and control both guys at once, but what I saw was potential for a heated competition. The bumping mechanics, the boosting that uses up some fuel...the game is filled with things to keep the experience engaging. Of course, since I didn't actually play multiplayer, this is all just assumption. The Singleplayer mode, the only thing I can really judge, was fun in a kind of Doodle Jump sort of way, but just didn't offer enough to keep me engaged for more than a few minutes.
Johnny Origin is a weird kind of broken. clicking on its icon just makes my cursor disappear until I alt+tab to a different screen...huh.
Junk Fighter is definitely the most intricate of the "J" games. First, let me address the title. I thought this was going to be a fighting game, but it's a space shooter. That would be the logical equivalent of me naming a boxing simulator "alien blaster 9000." But I digress.
This game has 2 different phases: the top-down space shooter and the ship builder. The former is a relatively fun challenge with a few minor design flaws and the latter is competently designed but not very rewarding.
First, the game part. The tutorial levels are way too long-winded and very clumsy at describing anything more complicated than "shoot the boss to kill it." After the almost insultingly easy tutorial levels, you will lose and lose a lot. The actual levels but the "hell" in "bullet hell." I think the main thing they were trying to accomplish with the design was making the player really feel challenged in customizing his ship. After all, a bigger ship with more guns can take down more enemies and reduce the amount of fire on the screen, but it will also be a bigger target.
And that brings us to the ship customization. The aforementioned quandry would make the customization screen fun and engaging if it weren't for one thing: the game already provides you with a multitude of ships far better than anything you and your puny brain can come up with. This completely defeats the purpose of the customization screen. The levels are way too brutal to allow you to screw around, so why would you not go with the professionally designed options? Even past that, the customization is far from balanced. The spread gun, as spread guns tend to be, is drastically overpowered, although with levels this brutal, it seems like the only way to win. It's not a bad game, but it can surely get frustrating.
Well, that's all I got for now. Until next time, stay diverse
Links
Jet Packers: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=24359
Johnny Origin: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=1407
Junk Fighter: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=8717
Friday, May 17, 2013
Ivar's Adieu
Another day, another review.
on a scale of none to none, I'm feeling really uncreative right now, so let's just run down the good ol' list, shall we?
Preface!
Ivar's Adieu is a unique, 2-level platformer-type thingy. Both of the levels are designed like 2D versions of Super Mario Galaxy planets in that you always gravitate toward the center. To traverse, you use a hookshot type thing. That makes me think: what's with it with all the swinging mechanics lately? Ever since Froggle, which pulled off swinging mechanics like a champ, game after game has been using swinging as one of, if not the main method of transportation. Well, more on that later.
Visual Style!
Nothing wrong with the art direction, but I do wish the first level were zoomed out a bit more. It's good that I get a nice, big, clear view of every sprite with the camera zoomed in so much, but almost every time I merrily swing around looking for my objectives, I get blindsided by some enemy projectile just out of my FOV. At least have the camera shift a bit when I build up a decent velocity, dang...
Sound Direction!
All I have to say here is that I wish there were more than one song in this game's soundtrack.
Gameplay!
Of all the 2D games I've played recently that try to make swinging the main method of transportation, this game comes the closest to pulling it off perfectly. However, it's still very glitchy. Sometimes, a platform will act like a slingshot and send you flying in the direction opposite to where you want to go. The hookshot can also be used for combat, and I gotta say, I love it when games use motions like swiping your mouse (or touchpad, in my case) for combat. Very visceral. Very fun. This the combat in this game is like Chain of Command but better. I just wish Ivar didn't have such a placid and kind voice, because when I hookshot an innocent penguin and catapult him into his friend so that they both go tumbling to their deaths, I like to imagine I'm a hardened warrior rather than a kindergarten teacher.
This game was fun and unique. Other than sporadic glitchiness, I can't really find a fault with it. It's a neat, contained experience that doesn't take more than 10 minutes. Try it out for yourself. I don't think you'll be disappointed. This game gets my seal of approval.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay salty
Links
I'm versed in poo: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=479
on a scale of none to none, I'm feeling really uncreative right now, so let's just run down the good ol' list, shall we?
Preface!
Ivar's Adieu is a unique, 2-level platformer-type thingy. Both of the levels are designed like 2D versions of Super Mario Galaxy planets in that you always gravitate toward the center. To traverse, you use a hookshot type thing. That makes me think: what's with it with all the swinging mechanics lately? Ever since Froggle, which pulled off swinging mechanics like a champ, game after game has been using swinging as one of, if not the main method of transportation. Well, more on that later.
Visual Style!
Nothing wrong with the art direction, but I do wish the first level were zoomed out a bit more. It's good that I get a nice, big, clear view of every sprite with the camera zoomed in so much, but almost every time I merrily swing around looking for my objectives, I get blindsided by some enemy projectile just out of my FOV. At least have the camera shift a bit when I build up a decent velocity, dang...
Sound Direction!
All I have to say here is that I wish there were more than one song in this game's soundtrack.
Gameplay!
Of all the 2D games I've played recently that try to make swinging the main method of transportation, this game comes the closest to pulling it off perfectly. However, it's still very glitchy. Sometimes, a platform will act like a slingshot and send you flying in the direction opposite to where you want to go. The hookshot can also be used for combat, and I gotta say, I love it when games use motions like swiping your mouse (or touchpad, in my case) for combat. Very visceral. Very fun. This the combat in this game is like Chain of Command but better. I just wish Ivar didn't have such a placid and kind voice, because when I hookshot an innocent penguin and catapult him into his friend so that they both go tumbling to their deaths, I like to imagine I'm a hardened warrior rather than a kindergarten teacher.
This game was fun and unique. Other than sporadic glitchiness, I can't really find a fault with it. It's a neat, contained experience that doesn't take more than 10 minutes. Try it out for yourself. I don't think you'll be disappointed. This game gets my seal of approval.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay salty
Links
I'm versed in poo: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=479
Thursday, May 16, 2013
It Belongs in An Ancient Ruin
well, this one was fun!
Before we analyze, let's have a bit of context. You play as the explorer and spelunker Pennsylvania Smith...
...*disgruntled groan*...
And you steal artifacts from museums and put them back in ancient ruins where they belong...*mumbles*
Alright, well other than...that...I liked almost everything about this game. Allow me to elaborate:
At first, the game starts out feeling a lot like Trilby: Art of Theft, the game made by the great internet cynic Yahtzee Croshaw. You work your way around security cameras, patrolling guards, and police dogs to activate switches, steal expensive stuff, and progress through the levels.
Unlike Art of Theft, this game is also a platformer. That's an interesting combination: platforming stealth game. This intermingling of genres is something I'd like to see more of. Sure, there are only so many ways to do this before the Cooking Mama RPG graces us, but still...I will say, though, there's no way to take out a guard or two in this game like there is in Art of Theft. Sure, that might not have fit in with the game's mechanics, but I found myself wondering why a man capable of jumping three times his own height is somehow not fit enough to take down a cop with a flashlight at close range. Oh well...
The second half of the game ditches the whole stealth aspect and just becomes Castlevania. Mmkay. I can deal with that. I'm down. Let's see what you got, game.
From then on, the game becomes an only minorly frustrating platformer with an actual storyline to keep you motivated. It was actually very well paced. It all lead up to a tense escape scene with the final boss, which was immensely satisfying...right up until the very end.
*minor spoiler warning*
The final boss, in the very last screen of the game, is standing right on the edge of a cliff leading into a lava pit. There is a hook positioned just right for you to be able to tarzan swing and kick him to his death, which would have been hugely satisfying. Unfortunately, you just walk right past him and win the game...*Sigh*
oh well. The game did have some missed opportunities, and there were some frustratingly designed aspects (like the evil suits of armor that kill me every time or the velociraptors that jump out of the bushes and give you about 0.0000001 seconds of reaction time before they send you back to the checkpoint).
There's lots more I want to talk about, but this post is getting a bit too long already. I guess I can say that the game's best qualities are its conveyance, sense of flow, and art direction (even though I hate pixel art as a concept in the modern world, this was done pretty dang well). all in all, this game is very competently designed and was one of the more enjoyable DigiPen experiences. Good work, guys.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay swingin'
Links
I don't feel like coming up with a name for this one: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=25076
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
iQ
God help me, I love puzzle games. After all, after a long day at school straining my mind for 11 hours straight and then coming home and squeezing some last precious drops of intelligence out to get my homework done, all I want to do is sit down in front of the computer and put my brain under some more stress.
I'm kidding, of course. I have nothing against puzzle games, especially if they're good. My girlfriend and I have spent hours playing that Tilt board game. Actually, iQ is quite similar to that game. For those of you who don't know what I'm talking about, lemme explain the mechanics of iQ. You push and pull blocks onto buttons using the force to advance to the next level. It's quite fun and it does everything it needs to.
See, this is my least favorite game to review because it's so simple that I've already said everything there is to say about it. It has all the makings for a perfect puzzle game that you'd expect to see on the app store or something. Based on that, I kind of have to grudgingly give it my seal of approval. I say grudgingly because this game didn't leave me with any kind of take away. It happened. I genuinely can't think of a flaw, though, so I guess iQ wins this round.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay smartical.
Links
eye que: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=25111
I'm kidding, of course. I have nothing against puzzle games, especially if they're good. My girlfriend and I have spent hours playing that Tilt board game. Actually, iQ is quite similar to that game. For those of you who don't know what I'm talking about, lemme explain the mechanics of iQ. You push and pull blocks onto buttons using the force to advance to the next level. It's quite fun and it does everything it needs to.
See, this is my least favorite game to review because it's so simple that I've already said everything there is to say about it. It has all the makings for a perfect puzzle game that you'd expect to see on the app store or something. Based on that, I kind of have to grudgingly give it my seal of approval. I say grudgingly because this game didn't leave me with any kind of take away. It happened. I genuinely can't think of a flaw, though, so I guess iQ wins this round.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay smartical.
Links
eye que: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=25111
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
Invade-n-Raid
hmm...a 2-D adventure starring an interplanetary mining robot with an "-n-" in the title...something about this seems unoriginal...
Yep, this game is brought to us by two of the people on the Dig-n-Rig team (plus one new member, who ostensibly decided to get rid of that horribly pretentious pixel art style). Will Invade-n-Raid be as confusing and unrewarding as its predecessor? Let's find out.
This game is actually relatively simple and, best of all, unique. Go figure, right? In order to dig for minerals, you have to burrow into a planet, which, instead of just being boring and giving you the elements, puts you in a quick Astrobunny-esque collection mechanic, which I find to be a huge improvement. Getting minerals actually feels rewarding and fun now. Combat is a fun mechanic as well. Madly tapping the "E" button to eliminate certain enemies is immensely satisfying. Getting hit by other enemies because you didn't know they were invulnerable to your attack, on the other hand, is not.
Other than that, the only problem I had was that figuring out which way gravity points is a little confusing. You know that feeling in a Sonic The Hedgehog game (especially the 3D ones) where you're pressing one direction to build up momentum but then you enter a loop or a turn or something and you don't quite know whether to keep holding that direction or to switch to wherever you're facing now? Ugh, that could have been worded better but you know what I'm talking about. That is this game in a nutshell.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay stellar
Links
https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=25885
Yep, this game is brought to us by two of the people on the Dig-n-Rig team (plus one new member, who ostensibly decided to get rid of that horribly pretentious pixel art style). Will Invade-n-Raid be as confusing and unrewarding as its predecessor? Let's find out.
This game is actually relatively simple and, best of all, unique. Go figure, right? In order to dig for minerals, you have to burrow into a planet, which, instead of just being boring and giving you the elements, puts you in a quick Astrobunny-esque collection mechanic, which I find to be a huge improvement. Getting minerals actually feels rewarding and fun now. Combat is a fun mechanic as well. Madly tapping the "E" button to eliminate certain enemies is immensely satisfying. Getting hit by other enemies because you didn't know they were invulnerable to your attack, on the other hand, is not.
Other than that, the only problem I had was that figuring out which way gravity points is a little confusing. You know that feeling in a Sonic The Hedgehog game (especially the 3D ones) where you're pressing one direction to build up momentum but then you enter a loop or a turn or something and you don't quite know whether to keep holding that direction or to switch to wherever you're facing now? Ugh, that could have been worded better but you know what I'm talking about. That is this game in a nutshell.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay stellar
Links
https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=25885
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Insecticide
short review today, guys. Insert flimsy excuse here.
Insecticide is my new defensive evidence to show to anyone who accuses me of giving FPS games a free ride just because shooters happen to be my favorite genre. Don't get me wrong, the gameplay isn't as bad as Echo's was, but I still can't recommend it.
First off, let's talk level design. The game starts you off in an area with only common SMGs, pistols, and some weird flying centipede type things along with their spawners. Naturally, as a gamer, your first instinct is to wreck shop. So you fire upon the spawners, since they're the only things that don't move or try to kill you, only to find that their health bars are way too big. Killing things, at first, is boring, but it's almost stimulating. Less ridiculous movement patterns, health bars, aim assist...all of these things would have been useful here.
So then, you go and explore the vast, open landscape until you come across what I call the "fun zone." Here, there are rocket launchers and swarms of wasps galore to keep your interest. I like how the game gradually leads you into the intense action, but the beginning stages needed some polish.
Speaking of polish, what happened with those centipede enemy things? The wasps, houses, ground and hilariously named taxi cab all have at least a little bit of detail to them, so why not the first enemies you see? Maybe they were following the method of making the player explore to get the good stuff, but I don't know. It still seems a bit unrefined.
That's a good word for this game in general. It's unrefined. That doesn't mean it's not good and it certainly doesn't mean it has a shaky foundation, but it does mean I can't quite recommend it just yet.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay swarmin'
Links
Inspect Inside: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=512
Insecticide is my new defensive evidence to show to anyone who accuses me of giving FPS games a free ride just because shooters happen to be my favorite genre. Don't get me wrong, the gameplay isn't as bad as Echo's was, but I still can't recommend it.
First off, let's talk level design. The game starts you off in an area with only common SMGs, pistols, and some weird flying centipede type things along with their spawners. Naturally, as a gamer, your first instinct is to wreck shop. So you fire upon the spawners, since they're the only things that don't move or try to kill you, only to find that their health bars are way too big. Killing things, at first, is boring, but it's almost stimulating. Less ridiculous movement patterns, health bars, aim assist...all of these things would have been useful here.
So then, you go and explore the vast, open landscape until you come across what I call the "fun zone." Here, there are rocket launchers and swarms of wasps galore to keep your interest. I like how the game gradually leads you into the intense action, but the beginning stages needed some polish.
Speaking of polish, what happened with those centipede enemy things? The wasps, houses, ground and hilariously named taxi cab all have at least a little bit of detail to them, so why not the first enemies you see? Maybe they were following the method of making the player explore to get the good stuff, but I don't know. It still seems a bit unrefined.
That's a good word for this game in general. It's unrefined. That doesn't mean it's not good and it certainly doesn't mean it has a shaky foundation, but it does mean I can't quite recommend it just yet.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay swarmin'
Links
Inspect Inside: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=512
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)