hmm...a 2-D adventure starring an interplanetary mining robot with an "-n-" in the title...something about this seems unoriginal...
Yep, this game is brought to us by two of the people on the Dig-n-Rig team (plus one new member, who ostensibly decided to get rid of that horribly pretentious pixel art style). Will Invade-n-Raid be as confusing and unrewarding as its predecessor? Let's find out.
This game is actually relatively simple and, best of all, unique. Go figure, right? In order to dig for minerals, you have to burrow into a planet, which, instead of just being boring and giving you the elements, puts you in a quick Astrobunny-esque collection mechanic, which I find to be a huge improvement. Getting minerals actually feels rewarding and fun now. Combat is a fun mechanic as well. Madly tapping the "E" button to eliminate certain enemies is immensely satisfying. Getting hit by other enemies because you didn't know they were invulnerable to your attack, on the other hand, is not.
Other than that, the only problem I had was that figuring out which way gravity points is a little confusing. You know that feeling in a Sonic The Hedgehog game (especially the 3D ones) where you're pressing one direction to build up momentum but then you enter a loop or a turn or something and you don't quite know whether to keep holding that direction or to switch to wherever you're facing now? Ugh, that could have been worded better but you know what I'm talking about. That is this game in a nutshell.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay stellar
Links
https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=25885
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Insecticide
short review today, guys. Insert flimsy excuse here.
Insecticide is my new defensive evidence to show to anyone who accuses me of giving FPS games a free ride just because shooters happen to be my favorite genre. Don't get me wrong, the gameplay isn't as bad as Echo's was, but I still can't recommend it.
First off, let's talk level design. The game starts you off in an area with only common SMGs, pistols, and some weird flying centipede type things along with their spawners. Naturally, as a gamer, your first instinct is to wreck shop. So you fire upon the spawners, since they're the only things that don't move or try to kill you, only to find that their health bars are way too big. Killing things, at first, is boring, but it's almost stimulating. Less ridiculous movement patterns, health bars, aim assist...all of these things would have been useful here.
So then, you go and explore the vast, open landscape until you come across what I call the "fun zone." Here, there are rocket launchers and swarms of wasps galore to keep your interest. I like how the game gradually leads you into the intense action, but the beginning stages needed some polish.
Speaking of polish, what happened with those centipede enemy things? The wasps, houses, ground and hilariously named taxi cab all have at least a little bit of detail to them, so why not the first enemies you see? Maybe they were following the method of making the player explore to get the good stuff, but I don't know. It still seems a bit unrefined.
That's a good word for this game in general. It's unrefined. That doesn't mean it's not good and it certainly doesn't mean it has a shaky foundation, but it does mean I can't quite recommend it just yet.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay swarmin'
Links
Inspect Inside: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=512
Insecticide is my new defensive evidence to show to anyone who accuses me of giving FPS games a free ride just because shooters happen to be my favorite genre. Don't get me wrong, the gameplay isn't as bad as Echo's was, but I still can't recommend it.
First off, let's talk level design. The game starts you off in an area with only common SMGs, pistols, and some weird flying centipede type things along with their spawners. Naturally, as a gamer, your first instinct is to wreck shop. So you fire upon the spawners, since they're the only things that don't move or try to kill you, only to find that their health bars are way too big. Killing things, at first, is boring, but it's almost stimulating. Less ridiculous movement patterns, health bars, aim assist...all of these things would have been useful here.
So then, you go and explore the vast, open landscape until you come across what I call the "fun zone." Here, there are rocket launchers and swarms of wasps galore to keep your interest. I like how the game gradually leads you into the intense action, but the beginning stages needed some polish.
Speaking of polish, what happened with those centipede enemy things? The wasps, houses, ground and hilariously named taxi cab all have at least a little bit of detail to them, so why not the first enemies you see? Maybe they were following the method of making the player explore to get the good stuff, but I don't know. It still seems a bit unrefined.
That's a good word for this game in general. It's unrefined. That doesn't mean it's not good and it certainly doesn't mean it has a shaky foundation, but it does mean I can't quite recommend it just yet.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay swarmin'
Links
Inspect Inside: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=512
Saturday, May 11, 2013
Infinite Ion (guest review)
“Luis, my fellow game-whore who has given up on writing
guest reviews” he says. I’ll show him...I’ll show them all!!! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Oh. You’re here.
So after that very
appreciated character assault, I thought it my duty to write a review. And
yes, I will resort to cheap shots. Also, I’ll be reviewing it as I play, which
means that I get to yell more, but which also means that my analysis may not be
super spot on at times.
Pre-Game:
Infinite Ion is a
game made by a bunch of sophomores. Their opening description is that it’s a
“cooperative bullet hell shooter based on the concept of polarity, based on Ikaruga.” So, naturally, I had to go and
see what Ikaruga was all about. And guess what, Ikaruga is a single-player bullet hell shooter based on the concept
of polarity. Made initially for the Gamecube, you press A to (literally) flip
between what I’ll just call the good Arwing and the evil Arwing. The good
Arwing can’t be harmed by blue light bullets and the evil Arwing can’t be
harmed by darkness bullets. Clever, but not too interesting.
Now, this game is a co-op game, and I’ve basically come to
the conclusion that there are three kinds of co-op games on the market. Your
first kind of co-op game would be your Borderlands and your Halo 3, where co-op
is appreciated, but not necessary. Your second kind of co-op game would be your
Portal 2, where it’s entirely separate from the rest of the game. And your
third kind would be your Dead Space 3 and your Resident Evil The Last Few and
your Borderlands 2, where it doesn’t need to be co-op, but for some reason is.
Guess which one this game falls under?
The menu screen is pretty generic, with a small explosion
particle effect thingy going on in the lower left, and all the options and
stuff over a decidedly bland logo. The music is decidedly boring, because it
sounds like it uses the same keyboard that they did for Deus Ex, but without
all of the cool.
Also, since co-op is required, I’ve enlisted the help of my
sixth grade brother, Napoleon, also known by his real name Matthew.
Post-Game:
“Look, it wasn’t something I would play again. Maybe I would
give it one or two more goes.” This coming from the child that has poured so
many hours into the Virtual Hat Simulator that is TF2 that he literally changed
the Steam layout so that he wouldn’t be embarrassed by how many days he’s
wasted playing it so far. Suffice it to say, kid knows a good game when he sees
one.
Surprise surprise, the co-op “definitely was a feature, but
wasn’t really necessary. It could’ve just been an option and not really forced
upon you.” Honestly, he’s spot on. From a mechanical standpoint, having co-op
does open up quite a few avenues for development, but these devs basically seem
to have said “Ikaruga with a friend”
A solid third of the bullet patterns are specifically
designed so that you can only complete them if both players simultaneously
complete a specific and complex series of maneuvers. Which is not fun to do with
two people. With one person, the excuse is, “Oh, I’m an ass, guess I need to
pay more attention.” Here, you’re completely reliant on your partner, and not
in a fun way. The game is your typical twitchy bullet hell fair, so mistakes
are obviously going to abound, but when one mistake can lose you two of your
shared six lives (side note: shared lives = stupid. Don’t do it.) everything
becomes increasingly combative.
Gun upgrades are received through small gold coins of
various sizes dropped by enemies. However, there’s nothing that explain the
relative value of each coin, or how many you need to upgrade, etc.
The backgrounds were dull and uninspiring. The music changed
each level but was so bland that I didn’t even notice it. The sound effects
were...okay. Nothing more than they needed to be.
Honestly, I came away from this game thoroughly bored. The
reason being that aside from the glaring unnecessary co-op, this game is
just...dull. There’s nothing else that’s really wrong with it, but it’s just a
kind of bland paste. If anything, it just proves that Ikaruga had some really cool ideas and solid execution that they
tried their damndest to mimic and failed at.
Ion Paired: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=25886
Shameless Plug: http://potentiallymeaningful.blogspot.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And thus, another honest day's work has been evaded. Thanks, bud. Since I don't have a mini-me to play with, you guys are just going to have to take Luis's word on this one.
Incandescence
Prior to playing Incandescence, I was notified by Luis, my fellow game-whore who has given up on writing guest reviews but not on playing these games for kicks, that this was the game controls like a cheetah with an inner ear problem. I'm paraphrasing, of course, but nevertheless, it's worth noting that I didn't go into this game very optimistically. That in mind, let's play this thang.
Well the controls definitely aren't great, but I've played a lot worse. Really the only problem is that the mouse sensitivity is too low, which wouldn't be a problem if the game allowed me to adjust it manually. Instead, I got a perplexing control options screen where the only options are "invert y axis" and a blank field for you to type stuff into, which does nothing. huh...
My main problem with the game is how it feels. Occasionally, you'll run into these glitchy-if-effective boost rails, which bring you up to a satisfying speed, but the momentum you gain from them runs out almost the instant you leave them. The rest of the game is pretty sluggish, all things considered. I'm just coasting around the city with no real sense of challenge or excitement. It's just plain ol' boring. If Igneous were paced like this, I would have torn it a new one because every other aspect of its design focuses on adrenaline. Incandescence, with its blue tonality, calming sound direction and placid control style, and consequence-free level design seems to go for a much more relaxing atmosphere, which is fine as long as there's something to keep me occupied. I need to derive some sense of fun from a game...that's why it's a game!
Imagine a game based on that one scene from Aladdin where you're just floating on a magic carpet through the clouds. No sense of danger, nothing standing in your way, you're just coasting. Every now and again a little piece of bread or whatever will float by that you can collect, but past that, nothing. Sounds fun, right? Yeah, I didn't think so. That's what Incandescence reminds me of.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay musical
Links
Ink on the fence: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=24656
Well the controls definitely aren't great, but I've played a lot worse. Really the only problem is that the mouse sensitivity is too low, which wouldn't be a problem if the game allowed me to adjust it manually. Instead, I got a perplexing control options screen where the only options are "invert y axis" and a blank field for you to type stuff into, which does nothing. huh...
My main problem with the game is how it feels. Occasionally, you'll run into these glitchy-if-effective boost rails, which bring you up to a satisfying speed, but the momentum you gain from them runs out almost the instant you leave them. The rest of the game is pretty sluggish, all things considered. I'm just coasting around the city with no real sense of challenge or excitement. It's just plain ol' boring. If Igneous were paced like this, I would have torn it a new one because every other aspect of its design focuses on adrenaline. Incandescence, with its blue tonality, calming sound direction and placid control style, and consequence-free level design seems to go for a much more relaxing atmosphere, which is fine as long as there's something to keep me occupied. I need to derive some sense of fun from a game...that's why it's a game!
Imagine a game based on that one scene from Aladdin where you're just floating on a magic carpet through the clouds. No sense of danger, nothing standing in your way, you're just coasting. Every now and again a little piece of bread or whatever will float by that you can collect, but past that, nothing. Sounds fun, right? Yeah, I didn't think so. That's what Incandescence reminds me of.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay musical
Links
Ink on the fence: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=24656
Friday, May 10, 2013
Igneous
I was excited to play this game for 2 main reasons. First, it's another IGF finalist. While that's by no means an end-all quality assurance stamp, it tends to act like it. Second, I have kind of an affinity for the word "Igneous" because when I was younger, my friends and I formed a band called "Igneus." Get it? Cuz we were a rock band...and we were hot...and we omitted a letter because we were clever like that...heh...hehe...ehhh...
well anyway, let it never be said that I'm a biased reviewer. Let's analyze Igneous as a game and nothing more, shall we?
The first thing I noticed about Igneous is that it proudly touts the fact that it was built from the ground up using C++. Wait a minute, doesn't that sound familiar? Why yes, Deity advertised itself in the same way. And, if you recall, I flipping loved Deity; it's probably my favorite game on the list so far. The graphical styles of the two games are similar, too. Huh...this game has set quite the challenge for itself by making me think of Deity.
The next thing I noticed is that the only two difficulty modes are "normal" and "impossible." Can't fault them for being direct, I suppose.
Alright, enough beating around the bush. Let's talk mechanics.
All things considered, this game reminds me more than Nitronic Rush than anything...oh, crap, wait...I'm not supposed to know about that game yet. Forget what I just said!
So, I started out this game on Impossible difficulty, and man, does it lead up to that name...I had to turn down the difficulty on level 2 (after all, I want to get some sleep tonight and I didn't know how long this game would be). Upon turning down the difficulty, however, the challenge factor took a disheartening turn for the frustrating. Every death was a cheap one. How the hell am I supposed to escape the falling ground when by the time it's started falling, I've already plummeted to my death?
Alright, let's take a step back and get the praise out of the way before I complain some more. At least until the cheap deaths kicked in, what this game did best was atmosphere. The intuitive control, the pleasant contrast of the visual style, the hectic music, and the jaw-dropping presentation put me right into that lovely state of flow. With the exception of Erebus, no game on this list has immersed me more in its universe.
Then, everything changed when the cheap deaths attacked.
And blah blah blah, I'd be talking in circles if I continued. Igneous is a great game that's sure to keep you on the edge of your seat. It's certainly a challenge for all those adrenaline-junky gamers out there. If you want a game that will put your ability to read the environment and make twitch decisions, this is your game. For utterly mastering that specific style of game, I'll go ahead and give it my seal of approval. I really considered withholding it because of the cheap deaths, but the game has so much to offer past that.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay molten
Links
Pig knees: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=8713
well anyway, let it never be said that I'm a biased reviewer. Let's analyze Igneous as a game and nothing more, shall we?
The first thing I noticed about Igneous is that it proudly touts the fact that it was built from the ground up using C++. Wait a minute, doesn't that sound familiar? Why yes, Deity advertised itself in the same way. And, if you recall, I flipping loved Deity; it's probably my favorite game on the list so far. The graphical styles of the two games are similar, too. Huh...this game has set quite the challenge for itself by making me think of Deity.
The next thing I noticed is that the only two difficulty modes are "normal" and "impossible." Can't fault them for being direct, I suppose.
Alright, enough beating around the bush. Let's talk mechanics.
All things considered, this game reminds me more than Nitronic Rush than anything...oh, crap, wait...I'm not supposed to know about that game yet. Forget what I just said!
So, I started out this game on Impossible difficulty, and man, does it lead up to that name...I had to turn down the difficulty on level 2 (after all, I want to get some sleep tonight and I didn't know how long this game would be). Upon turning down the difficulty, however, the challenge factor took a disheartening turn for the frustrating. Every death was a cheap one. How the hell am I supposed to escape the falling ground when by the time it's started falling, I've already plummeted to my death?
Alright, let's take a step back and get the praise out of the way before I complain some more. At least until the cheap deaths kicked in, what this game did best was atmosphere. The intuitive control, the pleasant contrast of the visual style, the hectic music, and the jaw-dropping presentation put me right into that lovely state of flow. With the exception of Erebus, no game on this list has immersed me more in its universe.
Then, everything changed when the cheap deaths attacked.
And blah blah blah, I'd be talking in circles if I continued. Igneous is a great game that's sure to keep you on the edge of your seat. It's certainly a challenge for all those adrenaline-junky gamers out there. If you want a game that will put your ability to read the environment and make twitch decisions, this is your game. For utterly mastering that specific style of game, I'll go ahead and give it my seal of approval. I really considered withholding it because of the cheap deaths, but the game has so much to offer past that.
That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay molten
Links
Pig knees: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=8713
Thursday, May 9, 2013
Ice Wars
Alright well this game didn't exactly "work" in the traditional sense...It crashed way too often to be considered playable. However, it did give me enough material to review it as if it did work...sort of.
Ok so the first thing you'll notice about this game is that there's no "how to play" screen. Oh good, you may say, Dean doesn't get to complain about the game insulting his intelligence by telling him how to WASD. Well, you're right, but as long as there are things in existence, mark my words, I will always find something to complain about. To be fair, I figured out everything I needed to within 5 minutes of playing, so the game doesn't convey things too horribly. It's just that they messed up a lot of simple things. Since when, for example, is it considered okay to highlight the names of the players' team in red? Especially considering that on the team selection screen, the player's name is in blue, this made figuring out who to click on more of a pain than it needed to be.
Anyways, what happens once you actually get the game figured out? Well, it's quite rewarding, actually. The concept alone is enough to sell me. This is what a "real time strategy game" should be! See, I have no problem micro-managing action points or resources or whatever if it means I can have a definite grasp of what I'm doing and how each action will influence the events of the game. This game pulls that off perfectly. You have no idea where your opponents are going to move or, therefore, where you should aim. You have to get into the head of the enemy and figure out what they're going to do and how to counter it. It's slow-paced, but really intense.
Everything else is really secondary. I would love to see a game like this get polished and re-released. I'm a stingy ol' miser, but even I'd fork over a few bucks on Steam or what have you for a version of this game that didn't crash every 2 minutes. Well done, DigiPen. This game, or rather the hypothetical functional version of this game, gets my seal of approval.
That's all for now. Until next time, stay chill.
Links
Rice Whores: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=509
Ok so the first thing you'll notice about this game is that there's no "how to play" screen. Oh good, you may say, Dean doesn't get to complain about the game insulting his intelligence by telling him how to WASD. Well, you're right, but as long as there are things in existence, mark my words, I will always find something to complain about. To be fair, I figured out everything I needed to within 5 minutes of playing, so the game doesn't convey things too horribly. It's just that they messed up a lot of simple things. Since when, for example, is it considered okay to highlight the names of the players' team in red? Especially considering that on the team selection screen, the player's name is in blue, this made figuring out who to click on more of a pain than it needed to be.
Anyways, what happens once you actually get the game figured out? Well, it's quite rewarding, actually. The concept alone is enough to sell me. This is what a "real time strategy game" should be! See, I have no problem micro-managing action points or resources or whatever if it means I can have a definite grasp of what I'm doing and how each action will influence the events of the game. This game pulls that off perfectly. You have no idea where your opponents are going to move or, therefore, where you should aim. You have to get into the head of the enemy and figure out what they're going to do and how to counter it. It's slow-paced, but really intense.
Everything else is really secondary. I would love to see a game like this get polished and re-released. I'm a stingy ol' miser, but even I'd fork over a few bucks on Steam or what have you for a version of this game that didn't crash every 2 minutes. Well done, DigiPen. This game, or rather the hypothetical functional version of this game, gets my seal of approval.
That's all for now. Until next time, stay chill.
Links
Rice Whores: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=509
Wednesday, May 8, 2013
Hyper Air Rally
Hyper Air Rally reminded me at first of A Series of Tubes. Hang on, though, don't run away just yet. That was only my first impression.
Once I got to dig into Hyper Air Rally what I saw as a fun, adrenaline-fueled air race. Like anything, though, it could be better. The designers seemed to be talented but misguided. There seemed to be a lot of unnecessary effort that, if redirected, could have turned this unfinished yet entertaining romp into an experience to rival Diddy Kong Racing.
The controls, I'm not gonna lie, take a bit of getting used to. They commit the mortal sin of making the arrow keys the primary directional buttons; and even go further to insult me by making "S" and "D" into secondary directional buttons. Nonetheless, once you do learn them, navigating the racetracks can be fun, albeit unimmersive due to the physics engine.
Oh yeah, the physics engine is a sack of lard on a hot summer's day. When you collide with a wall, you just kind of stick onto it with no kind of rebound to get you back on course. This means one crash is, more often than not, not only fatal but also infuriating.
Those are really the only two complaints I have with the game. I can look at most of these games, pick out their flaws and think "okay, maybe they just didn't have the time or manpower to iron that out," but that's not the case here. Fact is, they just tried to cram too much into the game; therefore, they weren't able to perfect the parts of the game that needed perfecting.
The weapons are the biggest culprit. I never even figured out how to use the weapons and every time an opponent fired upon me, I was able to dodge it without even trying. The controls are hectic enough without the added stress of timing and aiming rockets, so the weapons are just superfluous. The icing on the cake is that there are tons of weapons on the customization screen, each one a subtle middle finger to me and my desire for the game to wow me.
Even with all that, I had fun with Hyper Air Rally. That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay aerial
Links
Sniper Pear Valley: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=491
Once I got to dig into Hyper Air Rally what I saw as a fun, adrenaline-fueled air race. Like anything, though, it could be better. The designers seemed to be talented but misguided. There seemed to be a lot of unnecessary effort that, if redirected, could have turned this unfinished yet entertaining romp into an experience to rival Diddy Kong Racing.
The controls, I'm not gonna lie, take a bit of getting used to. They commit the mortal sin of making the arrow keys the primary directional buttons; and even go further to insult me by making "S" and "D" into secondary directional buttons. Nonetheless, once you do learn them, navigating the racetracks can be fun, albeit unimmersive due to the physics engine.
Oh yeah, the physics engine is a sack of lard on a hot summer's day. When you collide with a wall, you just kind of stick onto it with no kind of rebound to get you back on course. This means one crash is, more often than not, not only fatal but also infuriating.
Those are really the only two complaints I have with the game. I can look at most of these games, pick out their flaws and think "okay, maybe they just didn't have the time or manpower to iron that out," but that's not the case here. Fact is, they just tried to cram too much into the game; therefore, they weren't able to perfect the parts of the game that needed perfecting.
The weapons are the biggest culprit. I never even figured out how to use the weapons and every time an opponent fired upon me, I was able to dodge it without even trying. The controls are hectic enough without the added stress of timing and aiming rockets, so the weapons are just superfluous. The icing on the cake is that there are tons of weapons on the customization screen, each one a subtle middle finger to me and my desire for the game to wow me.
Even with all that, I had fun with Hyper Air Rally. That's all I got for now. Until next time, stay aerial
Links
Sniper Pear Valley: https://www.digipen.edu/?id=1170&proj=491
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)